Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Seto-Kaiba_Is_Stupid Date: Jan 17, 2009 10:44am
Forum: movies Subject: At least the 1950's wasn't as bad as the 1980's

Really? My parents don't remember being abused by THEIR parents. Plus my grandma says she and everyone else she knew didn't give a damn about the cold war. Come to think about it, everybody I've interviewed from the time says they didn't take these "Coronet" and such films very seriously back then either. Everybody talks about the 1980's being a "great" time but my grandma says it was pathetic when compared to the 1950's, 1960's, 1970's and 1990's. Then again, I've yet to meet anyone who enjoyed that turd of a decade. My grandma hated the 80's, my parents hated the 80's, my uncle hated the 80's, they enjoyed many decades but frankly they hated the 80's!

Then again, any decade which gives us garbage like Madonna cannot really be taken seriously.

This post was modified by Seto-Kaiba_Is_Stupid on 2009-01-17 18:44:58

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffNoiseCollector Date: Jan 17, 2009 12:25pm
Forum: movies Subject: Re: At least the 1950's wasn't as bad as the 1980's

HOLY SHIT! You suddenly and dramatically snapped from interesting but useless weirdness to startlingly blatant reality.

Great points and much shorder than the collosus I constructed in the other post.

Yeah, I don't understand my better half's obsession with that lame decade, the only good part of it was 1989, because it was over. Cocaine and digital FM synthesis... ouch... ever look at classic cars on the road? If you see a car from the 1980's still running take a picture, it will be worth something, crap all around. IBM had no clue what they were doing and apple was more popular, you know something is wrong right there.